Phd thesis results and discussion

Phd thesis results and discussion

Dec 09,  · Results and Discussion. The presentation and discussion of results falls into four parts. In section , we demonstrate the effect of extending the framework of quality-weighting by path-integrated attenuation. This is done by analysing the mean and the standard deviation of differences between the two ground radars, SUB and TAG, in different scenarios of quality filtering for a case in The results chapter of a thesis or dissertation presents your research results concisely and objectively. In quantitative research, for each question or hypothesis, state: The type of analysis used. Relevant results in the form of descriptive and inferential statistics. Whether or not the hypothesis was blogger.comted Reading Time: 5 mins Chapter 5 Discussion of findings PhD Degree in Tourism Management – Leslie, D () from which data was gathered is small, the researcher is of the opinion that the results still provide meaningful findings and insights that could be generalised to normal practice as carried out by the average hotel in

The Thesis Whisperer

The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis. The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. The discussion section is scary because you have to make new knowledge claims of your own, not just agree or disagree with other people.

Knowledge claims are like dumplings in the thesis soup or chocolate chips in the PhD cookie, phd thesis results and discussion. They will evaluate the quality, amount and — most importantly — the believability of your knowledge claims.

If you are too speculative you might tip over the believability cliff. Years ago I wrote a post on how to start the discussion chapter, phd thesis results and discussion. I gave a few suggestions for generating creative ideas, but not a detailed discussion of how to do any of them. The post was a useful starting point, but unfortunately not enough to actually help one of my students, Wendy, write her discussion chapters.

Like many thesis writers, Wendy has had a long slog with this project and is having trouble seeing the wood for the trees. Wendy is in the creative arts, so her findings are not in the form of formulas and graphs. The findings are really a series of observations which can be backed up with evidence. I think we made good progress with a whiteboard in the last meeting and I asked her if I could share what we did with the world, she generously agreed thanks Wendy!

How to write a Better Thesis suggests that you start the discussion by simply writing a huge list of everything you learned about your topic — these are your provisional conclusions, observations, interesting facts and statements.

The book suggests that you write this list with the help of a sympathetic listener who knows the project, like a supervisor. Wendy sat in a chair and just talked at me. I wrote what she said on the whiteboard, asking a question now and then to clarify or expand on a point. The whiteboard was an ideal medium for this task. We could both see it and it was easy to rub out stuff. The mud map enabled us to start sorting and organising the ideas.

Wendy still has one data collection phd thesis results and discussion to run so some findings are more speculative than others.

I added a few arrows and brackets to connect obviously related statements. This is a creative process which involves reading over the mud map again and again, writing ideas for over arching themes under which the findings might fit, phd thesis results and discussion. After about another 45 minutes of fiddling and arguing about it, we had this provisional list of four themes:.

We took a couple of photos of the board with my phone and then rubbed it all out. This is where we diverted from How to write a better thesis and brought in my favourite thinking tool, the spider diagram. We put the overall aim of the thesis in the middle of the bubble and put the emergent themes in the first layer of bubbles around it:. The third layer of bubbles contained findings from our mud map recorded in the photos on my phone that we thought fell under these themes.

As we wrote the findings into the bubbles we shifted the wording to find shorter ways of saying the same thing and started to blend some of the findings together.

This process enabled us to see how some findings from the mud map might fall under multiple themes, which suggested a satisfactory repetition was emerging. You know you have a thesis on your hands when you feel like you are saying the same thing over and over, but in a slightly different way every time. This is a stylistic choice — there is no right or wrong way to do it, but the diagram lets you imagine different results and discuss the implications of the various choices.

We took several photos as this diagram evolved and changed to present different options. At this point I was happy. I know I can work from a spider diagram, phd thesis results and discussion, but Wendy was still not comfortable.

She is a more creative person than me and was worried that she would muck around and just find more and more connections — a fair point. So I suggested we try using a matrix. While a spider diagram encourages you to see connections, a matrix forces you to think about hierarchy.

The snowflake method is a technique used by novel writers. It involves making a simple outline, which becomes more and more complex as the writing develops. We started by drawing a table like this:. The last column is a list of subheads. Each of these subheads will have words — a page of text. To further develop the snowflake, Wendy will write at least four points under each subhead, to make paragraph headings. With a little manipulation these paragraph headings become topic sentences for each paragraph.

From a huge mess of ideas the writing task now looks much simpler — just a matter of picking off the paragraph you want to tackle and writing — words. Of course, phd thesis results and discussion, in practice writing is not that easy, but this process does help you see the wood instead of the trees.

How about you? Got any tips on the discussion chapter? Have you used any methods like the ones outlined here? What works well for you? How do I start my discussion chapter? Love the Thesis whisperer and want it to continue? The Thesis Whisperer is written by Professor Inger Mewburn, director of researcher development at The Australian National University.

New posts on the first Wednesday of the month. Subscribe by email below. Visit the About page to find out more about me and my books. Listen to my podcasts: On the RegAcademics talk about The Chair and Whisperfest. Send me a message on Speakpipe, phd thesis results and discussion.

Email Address. Sign me up! After about another 45 minutes of fiddling and arguing about it, phd thesis results and discussion, we had this provisional list of four themes: We took a couple of photos of the board with my phd thesis results and discussion and then rubbed it all out. Step four: use a spider diagram to make connections explicit This is where we diverted from How to write a phd thesis results and discussion thesis and brought in my favourite thinking tool, the spider diagram.

We put the overall aim of the thesis in the middle of the bubble and put the emergent themes in the first layer of bubbles around it: The third layer of bubbles contained findings from our mud map recorded phd thesis results and discussion the photos on my phone that we thought fell under these themes.

Step Five: Make a snowflake At this point I was happy. Related posts How do I start my discussion chapter? The Zombie Thesis Theory Anxiety Love the Thesis whisperer and want it to continue? Share this: Print More Email Facebook Twitter Pocket Reddit LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram WhatsApp.

Like this: Like Loading Loading Comments Email Required Name Required Website. Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address Cancel Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.

How to finish a PhD thesis quickly - 5 simple tips to write a thesis in two months!

, time: 12:20

Results and Discussion | PhD Thesis

Dec 09,  · Results and Discussion. The presentation and discussion of results falls into four parts. In section , we demonstrate the effect of extending the framework of quality-weighting by path-integrated attenuation. This is done by analysing the mean and the standard deviation of differences between the two ground radars, SUB and TAG, in different scenarios of quality filtering for a case in Result and discussion sample thesis proposal. When writing a dissertation or thesis, the outcomes and discussion sections could be both most fascinating along with the most difficult sections to create. You might write these sections individually, or combine them right into a single chapter, based on your college’s guidelines as well as your own preferences Oct 27,  · The results chapter of a thesis or dissertation presents your research results concisely and objectively. In quantitative research, for each question or hypothesis, state: The type of analysis used; Relevant results in the form of descriptive and inferential statistics; Whether or Estimated Reading Time: 9 mins